Publication Ethics Code for Jurnal Analisis Pendidikan Sosial (JAPS)

Source: Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), https://publicationethics.org: https://publicationethics.org

Introduction

This publication ethics code is based on the principles of research and publication integrity outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), a leading international organization in the field of publication ethics. The code aims to ensure quality, reliability, and transparency in the manuscript publication process at the Jurnal Analisis Pendidikan Sosial (JAPS).

Publication Ethics Principles

The Jurnal Analisis Pendidikan Sosial (JAPS) journal is guided by the following principles:

Transparency and openness:
The journal's policies and procedures should be published clearly and easily accessible, including the peer review process, manuscript acceptance criteria, and conflict of interest handling.
Authors are required to disclose research funding sources and potential conflicts of interest.

Honesty and integrity:
Authors should ensure the originality of the manuscript, avoid plagiarism in all its forms, and cite sources used accurately and completely.
Reporting of research results should be accurate and objective, free from fabrication and falsification.

Objectivity and fairness:
The peer review process is conducted anonymously and independently by competent reviewers who have no conflicts of interest with the manuscript or authors.
Manuscript acceptance decisions are based solely on scientific criteria and are not influenced by external factors.

Respect for copyright and intellectual property rights:
The copyright of authors and other contributors should be respected and protected.
The use of materials or data belonging to others should be done with permission and proper citation.
Responsibilities of Stakeholders

Authors:
1. Ensure that the submitted manuscript is original and free of plagiarism.
2. Disclose research funding sources and potential conflicts of interest.
3. Follow the journal's writing instructions and policies.
4. Revise the manuscript according to the feedback from the editor and reviewers.

Editors:
1. Oversee a fair and independent peer review process.
2. Provide constructive feedback to authors.
3. Follow up on suspected breaches of publication ethics.
4. Make manuscript acceptance decisions based on scientific criteria.

Reviewers:
1. Conduct an objective and independent assessment of the manuscript.
2. Maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript under review.
3. Disclose potential conflicts of interest.

Journal Management:
1. Establish clear and transparent publication ethics policies and procedures.
2. Select competent editors and reviewers.
3. Provide publication ethics training for editors and reviewers.
4. Implement a mechanism for handling breaches of publication ethics.

Conclusion
The Jurnal Analisis Pendidikan Sosial (JAPS) journal is committed to upholding the highest international standards of publication ethics. This code of ethics is a guide for all stakeholders involved in the publication process, and is expected to be followed to ensure the reliability and credibility of the journal. Periodic review of this code of ethics will be conducted to ensure its relevance and effectiveness.